Let’s talk Gates – the No. 1 Failure to Comply
Examples of why owners attention to this particular Non Compliance

Over the years I’ve seen all sorts of non-compliances relating to the Pool Gate. More attention could be paid to this critical component, as it is the No. 1 failure to comply and the leading reason for child drownings or near drownings in the backyard pool.  Whether you have one pool gate or four, all of them are required to comply. Let’s have a look at some of those issues so that maybe you will be more aware of the risks relating to the Pool Gate.

Book An Inspection

No.1   – and the most dangerous Non Compliance for any Pool – the Propping of the Gate – often a brick or a pot or more concerning is the fitting of a device for the purpose of propping the gate and I’ve seen dozens of devices fitted!

No.2   – the failure to self-close and self-latch from any opening position.  Simple to fix yet commonly overlooked.

No.3   – the binding of the gate on long grass, raised ground levels, vegetation and retaining walls.  Owners need to test more often.

No.4   – the shielding of the gate release mechanism or the height of the gate release. https://www.poolcertify.com.au/is-your-glass-gate-latch-correctly-shielded/

No.5   – the fact that many pools have two, three or even four and in a number of cases, not one of the gates was found to be compliant.

No.6   – the inward opening gate.  This is an immediate failure to comply even if it self-closes correctly.

No.7   – the secondary gate, often that leads directly to the street, that by design is incapable of self-closing and self-latching

No.8   – the gate within a Boundary Fence – have you installed a gate that leads into the neighbouring property – quite often found to be a public area such as a lane-way or park.

No.9   – the use of a non-compliant material with gaps within the rods that exceed 100mm

No.10  – gaps exceeding 100mm below the gate.

No.11 – do not install a Gate with horizontal components within NCZ5, the 900mm Non Climbable Zone of the boundary fence

No.12 – the gate installed directly across an opening in the Residence

No.13- There is no landing – contrary to BCA requirements –  where more than 3  steps lead to a gate, there must be a landing

Making Pools Safer, One Inspection at a Time

Book An Inspection

 

The gate to this derelict pool on a vacant property was found to be propped open with a brick. This intentional defect is a significant risk to public safety.
This one has a hook fitted for the purpose of holding it in the open position.
These double gates open inwards and are incapable of self-closing and self-latching. The fact that they are padlocked shut does not make them compliant. They open onto a public area and directly into the yard, the whole of which is being utilised as the pool enclosure.

This inward opening gate is an immediate failure to comply with any Standard. Not only that, it binds on the ground so can be held in an open position. Notice the pool area contained play equipment – another breach of the Swimming Pools Act.

Book An Inspection
Clearly the gap exceeds 100mm in height and width and as such is not compliant. Dog kennels must be kept outside the pool enclosure.

This gate provides direct access to the street and is not capable of self-closure.
By installing a gate with horizontal components within NCZ5, a child could now climb the fence
In this scenario a large latching mechanism abuts the barrier within NCZ2 and the 500mm Exclusion Zone of the pool barrier.
The owner altered the fencing of this previously compliant enclosure to include a childs’ play area. Yes he roller door was an issue but remains  unresolved.
A landing is required for more than 3 steps

Book An Inspection
 

So reach out to our  Pool Compliance Inspector at Pool Certify

The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and is not intended to replace professional advice. The publisher of this article cannot be held liable for the creation of any new non-compliances. The publisher cannot prevent a failure to comply issued by this or any other inspector when advice has been misinterpreted.